|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.02 15:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
That "platform" clause was recently put in there by one idiot GM without any thought to the impossibility of enforcing it.
You can never prove that someone used the recruitment channel as a "platform" and there is no clear definition of what "recruitment scamming" is or isn't.
No one will ever get banned for fishing suckers out of that channel, and Goons know it. The GM who changed the MOTD should be fired for idiocy.
|
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
27
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 16:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
The rule is unenforceable.
What is a "recruitment scam" compared to a normal scam? How long after posting "looking for corp" in the recruitment channel is someone immune from various forms of scamming? Is demanding a security deposit always scamming now? Is keeping the stuff of an attempted infiltrator "scamming"?
The GM who is trying to push this should be fired because it makes their enforcement look incompetent and it gives a false impression of security. These are fundamental failures to perform his job, and show a worrying lack of judgment and forethought. A simple warning should be plenty, as with all scams and tricks that mostly newbies fall for. If people refuse to read or follow the warnings, then they do so at their own risk.
Trying to enforce an unenforceable rule just makes authorities look incompetent and impotent. |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
28
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 00:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
There you go. Props to CCP for fixing it.
Making unenforceable rules is as dumb in video games as it is in life. A clear warning is all new people need, and more than rich idiots deserve. |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 15:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Clearly the best course of action to maintain the integrity of CCP enforcement is to attempt to retroactively enforce an unenforceable rule that was removed precisely because its failed enforcement degrades the integrity of CCP enforcement.
TL:DR
yer dumb |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 15:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
It was unenforceable, that's why it was removed. Incidents like this just demonstrated how unenforceable it was.
You've missed the whole point of the entire 11 pages, and, once again, yer dumb. |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 15:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
No, the response is that people don't recruitment scam noobs because noobs don't have anything to scam.
Coming after GS for being newbie-unfriendly is just butthurt ignorance. |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 16:05:00 -
[7] - Quote
And I love posts from people who can't formulate convincing arguments, so they resort to millennia-old logical fallacies that even children can see through. |
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
34
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 17:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Killer Gandry wrote: Someone willingly ignored an instruction and should suffer the consequences.
Prove it. You can't because it's unenforceable.
Write more words next time.
Also, yer dumb.
|
Darth Tickles
Northstar Cabal Fatal Ascension
36
|
Posted - 2012.02.28 22:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Question : Did the transgressor find his victim in the recruitement channel and as such has used the recruitement channel as platform to find his victim? Answer : Yes.
PROVE IT! |
|
|
|